• HOME
  • BLOGS
  • PEOPLE & PLACES
  • MODEL AUTO-BIOGRAPHY
  • MILITARY
  • CHRISTMAS ISLAND JOURNAL
  • TRANS-USA JOURNAL
  • PATAGONIA & PERU JOURNAL
  • PATAGONIA & PERU (RSS)
  • GREEN LINE
  • PSV DELIVERY WORK
  • PSV VIDEOS
  • ELECTION 2010.
  • MINTERNE
  • TALKING PHOTOS
  • HUMOUR
  • LINKS
  • New Page

Thoughts

10/12/2010

1 Comment

 

Watching anarchy spreading through the streets of London, I can't help wondering why nobody seems to be drawing attention to what might be the root of the problem - and that is that the numbers of so-called students in the UK has pretty well quadrupled in recent years. So, it's patently obvious that it costs more nowadays and something has to be done to meet that additional expense.

Which part of that don't the protesters understand?

I said so-called students, by the way, because my idea of a student is someone who studies; in other word, analyses a subject in an academic manner. In my time, that was done at universities. In recent times, however, other further education establishments - former polytechnic colleges, for example - have been elevated to university status despite the fact that their students in some departments are only required to learn (as opposed to analyse) a trade or vocation. (I expect economy will have been a major factor for this; although I have heard it suggested that employers making degrees an occupational requirement might be the reason).

Now, if qualifications from former colleges have been elevated to degree status to meet the demands of employers, it shouldn't be unreasonable to suggest they re-introduce apprenticeship schemes. Then, they (the employers) could ensure their employees reach a standard which meets their own requirement and, perhaps, more importantly, some, if not all, of the cost could be met by the company. The money saved by the government could then be put back into 'proper' education - as opposed to trade-training.


1 Comment
MelanieH73
9/12/2010 11:44:47 pm

It's true that many courses that are really vocational qualifications have been 'elevated' to the status of a degree. Nearly 20 years ago I completed an HND in theatrical costume. I was taught to pattern cut, sew, research historical references, etc. but there was no analytical research. No real thinking required. But then, I was doing a vocational qualification. So fine. The year after I left the college, my course was 'elevated' to being a degree course. As a result it took a year longer to complete & cost students more (at that time, in living expenses only). And it garnered more revenue for the college. However, speaking with staff who taught the course in the couple of years after I left, nothing changed significantly in the nature of what was taught. In fact, the students' weekly hours of study were reduced. Result? Increased cost to state & student & no increase in the national intellectual capital.

We all need to accept that vocational qualifications are appropriate for many & that they are not lesser than an academic qualification. Our society needs people to do & well as think.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Welcome:
    Please feel free to Comment.

    Categories:

    All
    Crafty
    Election
    Memory Lane
    Minterne
    Miscellaneous
    Rambling
    Sport
    Thoughts
    Trixie

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.