• HOME
  • BLOGS
  • PEOPLE & PLACES
  • MODEL AUTO-BIOGRAPHY
  • MILITARY
  • CHRISTMAS ISLAND JOURNAL
  • TRANS-USA JOURNAL
  • PATAGONIA & PERU JOURNAL
  • PATAGONIA & PERU (RSS)
  • GREEN LINE
  • PSV DELIVERY WORK
  • PSV VIDEOS
  • ELECTION 2010.
  • MINTERNE
  • TALKING PHOTOS
  • HUMOUR
  • LINKS
  • New Page

Thoughts

24/7/2010

3 Comments

 

Amongst those with whom I enjoy a 'virtual' relationship within the world-wide-web, quite a few are much younger than me - and t
he likely reason for this age discrepancy is that I may have been chosen as a 'friend' or am being 'followed' because I'm Lloyd's dad. Going on from that, some of these acquaintances may have experienced a similar background to him; going to university during 'the Thatcher years', for example, and, as a consequence, developed a distinctly unfavourable impression of the Tories.

For whatever reason, these sentiments seem to be difficult to disguise - let alone ignore - and, since I sometimes have little better to do during an unwelcome retirement, I may have been guilty of a mischievous tweet from time to time in order to get a reaction. There is no malice intended and those to whom this might apply know who they are - and this is for them......

Almost as soon as I was old enough to have an informed opinion, I realised that I didn't feel a particular attachment to any political party. As time passed, however, although not always agreeing with their policies, it seemed to me that insofar as Conservative candidates were concerned, what you saw was what you got. Very few, for example, denied their connections with commerce and industry and it really wasn't surprising that their policies reflected that fact. 

Sadly, the same could not be said for many of those who claim to represent 'the left'. In my lifetime, from Harold Wilson through to Neil Kinnock and John Prescott, I can't begin to imagine how many Labour politicians were anxious to be seen to pour scorn on The Establishment - only to abandon their socialist principles the moment the offer of a lucrative directorship or a peerage came into the equation. If ever examples of poachers becoming gamekeepers were needed, look no further - and, although they are unlikely to admit it, I do wonder if some may have been inadvertently influenced by Churchill's words, " If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain." From their constituents' point of view, however, what they saw certainly wasn't what they ended up getting.

Interestingly
, as if to demonstrate the wisdom of Sir Winston's words, as I have matured over the past half-century, I've voted for all three major UK parties. What's more, I voted for the Green party during the most recent election; so, it could be said that my political views have been fairly eclectic. That said, my contempt for those described in the previous paragraph is such that I would find it difficult to bring myself to vote in a manner which might contribute towards a Labour victory.

Now, these sentiments don't make me blind to the shortcomings of the Conservatives. Much though I admired Mrs. Thatcher for curtailing the entirely inappropriate influence the trade unions were enjoying in the sixties and seventies, I looked forward to the 'new dawn' promised by New Labour in the nineties - only to be amongst many who were disappointed by the deceit of Messrs.
Mandelson, Campbell, Blair, Brown & Company.

It is in this respect (deceit) where I believe the right-wing of
UK politics differ from the left - because, whether you agree with them, or not - what the Conservatives deliver is what is expected of them. In a nutshell and to coin a modern phrase, they do what it says on the tin. The same, however, could not be said of the Labour party during my lifetime and, whilst I sympathise with those who seem unable to recognise the difference, I find it very difficult to understand why.

So, to sum up; I despise anyone who knowingly purports to be one thing and turns out to be something entirely different. I find it much easier to respect an imperfect person (who admits to their shortcomings) than one who may be better - but not what they claim to be. Paradoxically - and to demonstrate this sentiment - as much as I deplored the damage he did to the reputation of this country (industrial action was known as the British disease during the eighties), when Arthur Scargill formed his own political party to stand against official Labour candidates, although I had no sympathy with his political views, the fact that he was true to his convictions persuaded me to send him a cash donation.

Finally, based on Sir Winston's theory on maturing responsibly, my own life, to some extent, could hardly be described as 'text-book'. For example, I started off voting Tory but graduated towards a more liberal stance. Further evidence of a rather back-to-front pattern can be seen in some other respects, too. Instead of taking a 'gap year' before a working life, I was nearly 60 when I drove across the USA, approaching 70 when I embarked on a solo visit to Patagonia and Peru and, as I write, I'm looking into the prospect of sailing around the south Pacific islands in a cargo-boat in an effort to re-live experiences I enjoyed as a DUKW driver during the UK nuclear tests in the fifties.

I'm sure at some time in my life, I will have claimed to be normal; so, perhaps, I should think again before being so adamant that I despise anyone who knowingly purports to be one thing and turns out to be something entirely different.
3 Comments
The Coffee Lady link
26/7/2010 02:46:14 am

I think on the basis of just the last few weeks, I'd have to disagree with the idea that this government is doing what it said on the tin.

At the budget they stood up and said that Tax Credits would not be cut for those on £30,000 and would only affect those on £40,000 or over. But George Osborne's own figures quite clearly showed that wasn't true: that the budget was just the start of a process that would cut Tax Credits to those on £30,000 within a year.

When he said that he was cutting the Disability Living Allowance budget 'to reduce dependency and promote work', how many people listening assumed that this benefit was similar to incapacity benefit and paid only those who weren't earning themselves? Surely using those words was intended to create that effect – whilst he knew that DLA is paid to all disabled people, regardless of income, to cover the costs that non-disabled people don't face, including adapted housing, additional travel costs, etc. These benefits actually keep people in work. He knew that: his words were a lie.

Cameron harangued Gordon Brown during the TV leadership debates, asking him to recall all leaflets that suggested that the Conservatives would not tinker with the OAP bus pass – but then just weeks later we were reading stories about how the Conservatives were looking to tinker with the provision of the OAP bus pass.

But what irritates me above all is the rebranding of deficit caused by the global recession and the Government's decision to bail out the banks as chronic public sector overspending. If you look at a graph of the deficit over the years since the second world war, the graph doesn't really peak until these steps were taken. What is happening is an ideological attack on the public sector hidden behind claims that we were living beyond our means – when actually the banks have a good deal of our money. Rebranding it in this way takes the heat off the banks – who, as you say, are friends to the Conservatives – and instead puts it onto public sector workers, and those who work in areas funded by the sector, and those who rely on the services provided.

Cameron has his eye on my job, my husband's job, my tax credits and my daughter's disability benefits. Yet he claims to represent hardworking Britons.

I think it's interesting too that disatisfaction levels with the government have, according to the latest polls, fallen by the same proportion since the general election as they did after three years of Tony Blair's first government. I think that shows that a lot of people feel that they are not getting what they had been sold.

Reply
The Coffee Lady link
26/7/2010 04:12:24 am

Sorry, that's a double negative. I meant that disatisfaction levels have risen/ satisfaction levels have fallen.

Reply
B.C.
26/7/2010 06:31:24 am

d,

What a wonderful reply.

If nothing else, it give me some comfort to realise that some of what I write is actually being read. That said, although by no means overwhelmed by it, I've received a bigger response (through Twitter and e-mail) to this blog than to any other. Perhaps it has pressed a few buttons and, as I suspect you know, that was the intention.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Welcome:
    Please feel free to Comment.

    Categories:

    All
    Crafty
    Election
    Memory Lane
    Minterne
    Miscellaneous
    Rambling
    Sport
    Thoughts
    Trixie

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.